<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
  xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
  xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
  xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
  xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
  xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
  xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
  >

<channel>
<title>OVH Travaux</title>
<description><![CDATA[OVH Travaux]]></description>
<link>http://status.ovh.net/</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:40:51 +0200</pubDate>
<item>
<title>Domain names:: FS#8832 — ns.kimsufi.com sdns1.ovh</title>
<description><![CDATA[We have noticed that there is currently a large number of zone transfers pending. <br />
This could generate latency in receiving the zone by secondary DNS.<br />
<br />
We are investigating it now to find out the cause of the problem.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Task Type: Maintenance</strong></p><p><strong>Category: com</strong></p><p><strong>Status: Planned</strong></p><br />We have noticed that there is currently a large number of zone transfers pending. <br />
This could generate latency in receiving the zone by secondary DNS.<br />
<br />
We are investigating it now to find out the cause of the problem.]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:40:51 +0200</pubDate>
<link>http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&amp;id=4902</link>
<guid>http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&amp;id=4902</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Network:: FS#8819 — anti-spam network</title>
<description><![CDATA[We are carrying out setup tests on the duplication of outgoing email flow.<br />
The idea is to duplicate all the traffic created by customers, going out <br />
through port 25 (smtp) on an anti-spam network, and then to analyse the sample of<br />
emails leaving our network in real time by IP, in order to control <br />
whether the IP sends spam or not.<br />
If we detect an IP that does send spam, the aim is to be able to block the<br />
flow of (only) port 25, in less than 5 seconds after spam is first detected.<br />
All this without affecting the service performance for the customers<br />
that do not spam.<br />
<br />
In actual fact, we have far too many spam issues and it isn't enough to shutdown the<br />
servers a few hours after having detected the spam. It's too late.<br />
It must be done in real time and must be able to block the flow in a matter of<br />
seconds. So we are thinking of how to successfully cleanse our network of spammers<br />
(who can order servers like everyone else, in just a few minutes)<br />
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Task Type: Maintenance</strong></p><p><strong>Category: the whole network</strong></p><p><strong>Status: In progress</strong></p><br />We are carrying out setup tests on the duplication of outgoing email flow.<br />
The idea is to duplicate all the traffic created by customers, going out <br />
through port 25 (smtp) on an anti-spam network, and then to analyse the sample of<br />
emails leaving our network in real time by IP, in order to control <br />
whether the IP sends spam or not.<br />
If we detect an IP that does send spam, the aim is to be able to block the<br />
flow of (only) port 25, in less than 5 seconds after spam is first detected.<br />
All this without affecting the service performance for the customers<br />
that do not spam.<br />
<br />
In actual fact, we have far too many spam issues and it isn't enough to shutdown the<br />
servers a few hours after having detected the spam. It's too late.<br />
It must be done in real time and must be able to block the flow in a matter of<br />
seconds. So we are thinking of how to successfully cleanse our network of spammers<br />
(who can order servers like everyone else, in just a few minutes)<br />
<p><strong>Comments: </strong></p>
<p><i>Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2013 16:26:39 +0200</i></p>
<p style="font-size:90%;">The duplication of outgoing smtp flow has been set up.

We have 2.5Gbps to analyse in real time.</p>
<p><i>Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:37:18 +0200</i></p>
<p style="font-size:90%;">We are thinking of launching the R&D in a few days, 
the time it will take to build the server powerful 
enough to perform all analysis operations locally, 
then extracting only the stats on the amount of spam by IP.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:33:32 +0200</pubDate>
<link>http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&amp;id=4889</link>
<guid>http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&amp;id=4889</guid>
</item><item>
<title>ADSL / SDSL:: FS#8826 — Optic loop Hauts-de-Seine (92)</title>
<description><![CDATA[There was an outage of a few seconds on the NRA optic loop in the 92 area.<br />
Securitisation played its part and the issue has been resolved. <br />
However, an optical signal is damaged, a team is on site to check the <br />
connectors and connections and we have also opened a ticket with the fibre operator.<br />
]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Task Type: Incident</strong></p><p><strong>Category: Backend / Core</strong></p><p><strong>Status: Finished</strong></p><br />There was an outage of a few seconds on the NRA optic loop in the 92 area.<br />
Securitisation played its part and the issue has been resolved. <br />
However, an optical signal is damaged, a team is on site to check the <br />
connectors and connections and we have also opened a ticket with the fibre operator.<br />
<p><strong>Comments: </strong></p>
<p><i>Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 18:53:22 +0200</i></p>
<p style="font-size:90%;">We have verfied the optic positions on sites DEF92 and
de NAN92, the problem is not on the part that we are responsible for.
We have relaunched the optic operator, and a team is on the way
in order to carry out some reflectometry test on the fibre optics.</p>
<p><i>Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:33:23 +0200</i></p>
<p style="font-size:90%;">The operator has found the problem on the fibre optic
and is starting the works.
</p>
<p><i>Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:27:00 +0200</i></p>
<p style="font-size:90%;">Operation terminated, the fibre has been repaired. Securitisation is fully operational again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:31:17 +0200</pubDate>
<link>http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&amp;id=4896</link>
<guid>http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&amp;id=4896</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Network:: FS#8805 — bhs-1/2-6k</title>
<description><![CDATA[We have an issue with this on these routers which is affecting BHS routing. We are looking into the cause of the problem.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Task Type: Incident</strong></p><p><strong>Category: the whole network</strong></p><p><strong>Status: Finished</strong></p><br />We have an issue with this on these routers which is affecting BHS routing. We are looking into the cause of the problem.<p><strong>Comments: </strong></p>
<p><i>Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 14:43:43 +0200</i></p>
<p style="font-size:90%;">The CPU on the 2 routers was found to be very high for a period of 30-40min between 10:20 and 11:00 UTC. Routing towards dedicated servers in BHS1 was affected during this period.

This problem is linked to manipulations that were taking place at the time on the switch uplinks of the network 192.95.32. We are verifying the logs but it seems that a L2 loop had formed for a few seconds, which destablised the routers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:30:40 +0200</pubDate>
<link>http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&amp;id=4875</link>
<guid>http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&amp;id=4875</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Network:: FS#8828 — LDN/NWK</title>
<description><![CDATA[We currently have 6*10G down between Londres and Newark.<br />
<br />
Traffic is being routed through 10 other transatlantic 10G circuits.<br />
<br />
We are contacting our supplier.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Task Type: Incident</strong></p><p><strong>Category: the whole network</strong></p><p><strong>Status: Planned</strong></p><br />We currently have 6*10G down between Londres and Newark.<br />
<br />
Traffic is being routed through 10 other transatlantic 10G circuits.<br />
<br />
We are contacting our supplier.<p><strong>Comments: </strong></p>
<p><i>Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:29:36 +0200</i></p>
<p style="font-size:90%;">Our supplier has informed us that maintenance works are being carried on their transmission equipment.
The circuits will be back up on 23-06-2013 at 23:00:00 GMT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:29:36 +0200</pubDate>
<link>http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&amp;id=4898</link>
<guid>http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&amp;id=4898</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Network:: FS#8820 — n5 BHS</title>
<description><![CDATA[We are going to modify the uplinks configuration in order to <br />
homogeniser the OVH network infrastructures.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Task Type: Maintenance</strong></p><p><strong>Category: Beauharnois</strong></p><p><strong>Status: Finished</strong></p><br />We are going to modify the uplinks configuration in order to <br />
homogeniser the OVH network infrastructures.]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 13:06:14 +0200</pubDate>
<link>http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&amp;id=4890</link>
<guid>http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&amp;id=4890</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Dedicated servers:: FS#8831 — Nas HA 10.16.100.69</title>
<description><![CDATA[We have to intervene on the backup pool, we are switching the service onto the slave node.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Task Type: Maintenance</strong></p><p><strong>Category: Associated service</strong></p><p><strong>Status: Planned</strong></p><br />We have to intervene on the backup pool, we are switching the service onto the slave node.]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:35:20 +0200</pubDate>
<link>http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&amp;id=4901</link>
<guid>http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&amp;id=4901</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Dedicated servers:: FS#8802 — nas6.storage.ovh.net</title>
<description><![CDATA[The server is unavailable, an intervention is in progress.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Task Type: Incident</strong></p><p><strong>Category: Associated service</strong></p><p><strong>Status: Finished</strong></p><br />The server is unavailable, an intervention is in progress.<p><strong>Comments: </strong></p>
<p><i>Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 11:09:15 +0200</i></p>
<p style="font-size:90%;">The service is up again. We are investigating the cause of the failure.</p>
<p><i>Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:47:13 +0200</i></p>
<p style="font-size:90%;">The server is unstable, we are preparing a spare.</p>
<p><i>Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2013 12:47:50 +0200</i></p>
<p style="font-size:90%;">The server has been replaced and is operational.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:33:57 +0200</pubDate>
<link>http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&amp;id=4872</link>
<guid>http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&amp;id=4872</guid>
</item><item>
<title>Network:: FS#8794 — UPC (AS6830) Frankfurt</title>
<description><![CDATA[We are going to set up a 30G link between<br />
OVH and UPC in Frankfurt, DE.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Task Type: Modernization</strong></p><p><strong>Category: the whole network</strong></p><p><strong>Status: Finished</strong></p><br />We are going to set up a 30G link between<br />
OVH and UPC in Frankfurt, DE.<p><strong>Comments: </strong></p>
<p><i>Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:37:29 +0200</i></p>
<p style="font-size:90%;">It is on prod.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:37:38 +0200</pubDate>
<link>http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&amp;id=4864</link>
<guid>http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&amp;id=4864</guid>
</item><item>
<title>VoIP:: FS#8830 — Codecs</title>
<description><![CDATA[We reload the DSP voice compression on phone cards.<br />
Some modules are on a blocked status.]]></description>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Task Type: Maintenance</strong></p><p><strong>Category: Backend / Core</strong></p><p><strong>Status: Finished</strong></p><br />We reload the DSP voice compression on phone cards.<br />
Some modules are on a blocked status.<p><strong>Comments: </strong></p>
<p><i>Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:33:52 +0200</i></p>
<p style="font-size:90%;">Reloading all cards was properly done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 08:34:34 +0200</pubDate>
<link>http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&amp;id=4900</link>
<guid>http://status.ovh.net/?do=details&amp;id=4900</guid>
</item></channel>
</rss>